What AI Hallucinations Are And How to Control the Risk
What Is An AI Hallucination?
When a model confidently produces something that isn’t true, like an invented statistic, a fabricated citation, or an imaginary policy, that’s a hallucination.
It happens because models predict likely words, not true words. If your prompt is vague, your sources are messy, or the system is allowed to improvise in public, the model will fill in the blanks. Nicely. Persuasively. Wrong.
For marketing and MOPS, it shows up as:
Blog posts that cite studies that don’t exist
Chatbots improvising pricing and warranty terms
Sales enablement that “remembers” competitor features that aren’t real
Analytics summaries that surface trends that your data doesn’t support
Accuracy is a reflection of your entire system. If you want fewer hallucinations, fix the system around the model.
Four Contrarian Positions I Stand By
1) Zero hallucinations is the wrong goal. Optimize for verifiability.
If you promise “100% accurate AI,” you’re setting up Legal, Support, and your brand for pain. I design for verifiable-by-design instead: require citations and timestamps for factual claims, constrain answer types, and make “I don’t know” an acceptable outcome. Trust grows when your system admits uncertainty and shows its work.
Do this: Add inline citations, last-updated stamps, and a refusal pattern where the model can escalate to a human.
2) RAG won’t save you if your documents are trash.
Most hallucinations are actually content ops failures. If your knowledge base is stale, unversioned, and poorly tagged, grounding is performative. Retrieval on bad inputs produces polished nonsense.
Do this: Treat document governance like product: canonical “truth tables” for pricing/specs/policies, ownership, versioning, metadata, and freshness SLAs. Measure recal and source coverage weekly.
3) Never let chatbots improvise policy, pricing, or terms.
I’ve reviewed too many bots that riff on sensitive claims. Customer-facing AI should not be free-form in regulated or high-risk areas.
Do this: Route policy/pricing intents to deterministic templates or approved snippets. Force a graceful “I don’t know” and handoff for anything outside scope.
4) Separate facts from brand voice.
Fine-tuning voice and facts together is how you get confident nonsense in your brand tone.
Do this: Lock claims first, then apply brand voice as a post-process. Your differentiation survives without inviting invented facts.
Where AI Hallucinations Hurt Your Funnel
Content & Thought Leadership: Fabricated sources, misattributed quotes, invented market sizes.
SEO / AI Overviews: Weak or inconsistent facts in your site become wrong answers in search summaries.
Customer Support & Sales Chat: Improvised entitlements (discounts, SLAs) that Support must honor.
Analytics & Reporting: Hallucinated “insights” that push budget in the wrong direction.
Legal/Brand: Unsubstantiated claims and IP missteps that turn into retractions.
When to Safely Use Hallucinations on Purpose
There is a legitimate place for creative wrongness, but only inside a fenced sandbox. Use it to widen the solution space, not to make public claims.
I always advise clients to opt for the sandbox!
Use the sandbox for:
Ideation and message angles, headlines, social hooks, and campaign concepts.
Concept art, low‑fidelity wireframes, mood boards, and naming explorations.
Rapid variant generation for A/B ideas (themes, narratives, offers).
Hypothesis surfacing for research ("What else could be true?"), never as facts.
Non‑negotiables:
Internal‑only; no customer‑facing copy or support responses.
No PII or regulated data. Keep sandbox data synthetic or de‑identified.
Label conspicuously: UNVERIFIED DRAFT – FOR IDEATION ONLY in file names and headers; watermark images.
Prohibit sensitive claims: pricing, terms, warranties, compliance, medical/financial assertions.
Isolate the workspace: separate models/tenants, disabled connectors, and limited retention.
Settings: high temperature/top‑p allowed in sandbox; production runs low temperature with forced citations.
Go-live criteria (exit to production):
Prove every claim. Link each fact to a real source or your internal truth tables (pricing, specs, policies).
Ground → Verify. Generate from approved sources, then have the owner review. Delete anything that isn’t cited or is outdated.
No risky improvisation. Don’t let copy invent pricing, policy, or legal language. Use approved wording or escalate.
Style last, with receipts. Add brand voice only after facts are locked. Publish with citations, timestamps, and an audit trail.
Conclusion
You will not eliminate hallucinations. You can, however, make them boringly manageable. Treat accuracy as a system outcome, not a model wish. Design for verifiability, invest in document governance, constrain high-severity claims, and measure harm instead of hype. That’s how you get the speed of AI without outsourcing your credibility.
Is your MOPS AI-ready? Take my AI-Readiness for MOPS quiz to identify opportunity gaps and foundational improvements.